This is a Republic, not a Democracy. Let's keep it that way!

Obama Birth Certificate Found To Be Fake

with 7 comments

An official investigation conducted by a cold case posse of trained investigators sought to validate the long form birth certificate of President Barack Hussein Obama that was released by the White House in response to Mr. Donald Trump’s public demands. This release was accompanied by a televised speech by our president in which he confirmed its authenticity. The attempt to confirm the contents of the long form birth certificate quickly disintegrated as the electronic version of the document contained anomalies which made it virtual impossible to confirm that a hardcopy counterpart was the source of the document. In fact, the detailed forensics analysis has produced enough evidence to suggest probable cause that a forgery and a fraud has been committed. There was no information released as to who was suspected of these felonies and there has been no conclusion drawn with respect to the president’s eligibility to serve in the oval office. The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the White House released Long Form Birth Certificate is insufficient documentation for the purposes of validating that President Barack Hussein Obama is a natural-born citizen. I am posting the video content that was on display for the media at the public press conference which was held in conclusion of the preliminary investigation. It is not yet known what course additional investigations may follow nor who may take on the responsibility of continuing the investigation.

Additional Reference: A Question of Eligibility A 32 Page PDF Document that explores the many facets of President Obama’s life narrative in light of the eligibility question.

Trackback: Here is my previous post which expressed my own reservations about this document within a week or two of its release.

Written by federalexpression

March 4, 2012 at 4:18 am

Posted in Issues, People

Tagged with , ,

7 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. THREE Republican and several Democrat officials have confirmed the facts on Obama’s birth certificate, and they are further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers (which were only sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii. The papers did not accept birth notices from relatives or birth notice advertising in those days.) And still further confirmed by a witness who wrote home after being told of the birth (to her father, named Stanley, about the unusual event of a child being born to a woman named Stanley that day).


    March 6, 2012 at 9:47 am

    • Once again, A valid document is required. The investigation simply says that this particular document is a fraud. If the “facts” in this document are true, lets see the hardcopy. Personally, I find this all really annoying, as the government provides me almost no personal privacy. I have to furnish a birth certificate to enroll my child in little league baseball and I have to go through a background check to volunteer yet we have a president that has the audacity to hide his documents from the constituents he is supposed to serve. Why does this guy get special consideration? It’s a two-way street.


      March 6, 2012 at 12:45 pm

  2. Re: “A valid document is required.”

    So why didn’t the investigation even ASK to see the official physical copy that the DOH of Hawaii stated twice in writing that she had sent to Obama and that the White House had passed around in the White House press room? That is a hard copy, it is the official copy–on security paper with the raised seal on the back. Yet the posse did not ask to see it. They simply made claims about the software. Crazy claims because they always assumed that the document was scanned under PDF and it was scanned using a MAC equivalent of PDF. Oh, and the posse did not ever name the so called experts that it was relying on that claimed the birth certificate was forged.

    Further research on the forgery issue:






    The DOH of Hawaii stated in a letter that she had seen the original birth certificate being copied onto security paper and that was the document that she gave to Obama’s lawyer. That physical copy was passed around in the White House press room and everyone there got a chance to hold it, and feel the seal. One reporter even photographed it.


    March 6, 2012 at 1:08 pm

  3. Re: “I have to furnish a birth certificate to enroll my child in little league baseball..”

    Answer: Obama has shown his birth certificate twice, short-form (the official birth certificate) and long form. He has shown both images on the Web and the actual physical copies. The official physical copy of the long form was passed around in the White House press room. THREE Republican and several Democrat officials in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on it.

    IN CONTRAST, none of the Republican candidates for president has shown his birth certificate.


    March 6, 2012 at 2:00 pm

  4. Wow, I guess I can sleep well tonight. Thanks for putting me in my place. Usually, when a duly authorized investigation turns probable cause of a crime, a grand jury gets an opportunity to weigh the preliminary results. If an indictment is handed down, then a trial is held. Since it is impossible for people like me to see the original doc, and since a preliminary investigation questions its veracity, I see no harm in convening a grand jury to dig deeper. An empowered Grand Jury can demand documents. Surely, if a grand jury or a trial jury confirms the document then the issue can be put to rest. I can’t rely on a dozen people who say it is valid because these statements are not under oath. I certainy can not rely on factcheck since their funding is traced back to the Annenberg Foundation. The very same foundation that President Obama was closely alligned with in Illinois. If the preliminary investigation is flawed, presumably, a grand jury can determine that or a defense lawyer can show that in general trial. I don’t feel the need to discuss all the particulars since all of the testimony thus far is not under oath, is rumor. or hearsay, If you truly object to the information returned by the preliminary investigation, or disagree with the methodolgy, I suggest you conduct your own investigation and demonstrate how this document can be rebuilt from the original. Again, I am not discussing the nativity of Barack Obama in this post. I am simply reporting that the document has been called into question.


    March 6, 2012 at 3:30 pm

    • Re: “I see no harm in convening a grand jury to dig deeper.”

      For that to happen there has to be a district attorney in a place where the crime took place to call that grand jury. “Citizen grand juries” are simply mobs, in this case probably mobs of birthers.

      NO DA will call a grand jury because, duh, there isn’t any evidence. Sure, Sheriff Joe, who hates Obama, has said that there was evidence. But there isn’t any.

      Re: “I certainy can not rely on factcheck since their funding is traced back to the Annenberg Foundation.”

      All that they did was to take photos of the front and back of the short-form birth certificate, showing the raised seal. Whatever your views of the Annenburg Foundation (founded by one of Ronald Reagan’s closest friends), it is laughable to suggest that they have the skill to forge such a detailed photograph. Besides, the physical copy of the short form was shown BOTH to FactCheck and Politifact. FactCheck simply took a better photo.

      In addition to the photo of the short form, there is also a photo of the long-form–only the front of it, however.

      In addition to these photos, there are the confirmations by three Republican officials in Hawaii and the birth notices in the newspapers in 1961, and a witness statement.

      Here is the photographic image of the physical copy of the long-form birth certificate that was passed around in the White House Press room, and the statement of the reporter who photographed it that she had felt the raised seal:


      Here is the photographic image of the physical copy of Obama’s short form birth certificate, front and back.


      Here is confirmation that it is the official birth certificate that Hawaii issues


      Here is the first of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.


      Notice where it says that there is an original birth certificate filed. Well, in 1961 foreign birth certificates, even those from other states, could not be filed in Hawaii. So the birth certificate in Obama’s files must be a Hawaii birth certificate.

      Here is the second of the confirmations by the officials in Hawaii.


      Notice where it says that the document in the files VERIFIES that Obama was born in Hawaii. So, not only is there an official Hawaiian birth certificate in the files, but it says right on it that Obama was born in Hawaii. Hawaii has never allowed the Department of Health to issue a birth document of any kind that says on it that anyone was born in Hawaii unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii, and that is what the officials in Hawaii have confirmed twice.

      And here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican, that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital


      And here is the statement of a witness who recalls being told of Obama’s birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, in 1961:


      Here are the birth notices of Obama’s birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.



      March 6, 2012 at 4:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: